Tag: controversy

Posted in technology

New class action suit resurrects iPhone throttling controversy

A new class action lawsuit filed in California takes aim at an erstwhile iOS battery management tool that allegedly hindered the performance of certain iPhone 6, iPhone 7 and iPhone SE series devices.

Filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, the complaint is the latest in a series of lawsuits targeting the so-called “batterygate” fiasco from 2017. The complaint arrives on the same day as a submission deadline for iPhone owners to file claims in a $500 million settlement that was reached earlier this year to rectify identical grievances.

Discovered shortly after the release of iOS 10.2.1, the iPhone throttling issue was traced back to a hardware management tool that was included in iOS to mitigate negative effects of aging iPhone batteries. In particular, the software was designed to thwart unexpected shutdowns suffered by certain iPhone 6 and 6s devices, but was maintained well into the lifecycle of iPhone 7.

Release notes accompanying the 10.2.1 release state the update “improves power management during peak workloads to avoid unexpected shutdowns on iPhone.” No mention of CPU throttling is made, nor is the management feature detailed in full.

Third-party tests confirmed the presence of an undisclosed throttling process, prompting Apple to issue an apology to iPhone owners for a lack of transparency. To make up for the alleged indiscretion, prices on out-of-warranty battery replacements were cut and the company later introduced a battery health tool that allows users to disable the throttling feature manually.

Still, the lawsuits flowed in. A total of 61 class action complaints were consolidated in April 2018 by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, with Apple ultimately agreeing to settle in March of this year.

Terms of the settlement grant members about $25 each for their troubles. The actual payout

Posted in technology

Chamath Palihapitiya responds to Coinbase controversy: Get a soapbox

  • Well-known venture investor Chamath Palihapitiya said on his “All-In” podcast that employees should be able to have free-form debate on any topic, on one condition — they should have to speak from a physical soapbox.
  • The investor was responding to the Coinbase controversy where Brian Armstrong told employees in a memo last week that politics and social causes had no place at the company.
  • “You put the soapbox someplace — in a safe space — where you can go and you can talk and people who want to listen will listen, and people who need to work can work, and people who don’t want to listen don’t have to be forced to listen,” Palihapitiya said on the podcast.
  • Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

The head of Coinbase, Brian Armstrong, created a firestorm in tech last week when he told employees in a memo to leave their politics and social causes at the door. Social causes were a “distraction” from the company’s mission, he wrote, and he later told employees that anyone not on board with this apolitical policy would be offered severance.

Venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya has a suggestion for founders like Armstrong running companies in these divisive times.

Put a literal soapbox in the office.

That’s what the founder of Social Capital said on his podcast, “All In,” on Friday. Palihapitiya, perhaps best known for his investment in Slack, said companies would be better served having their employees express their ideas in a designated space on campus, where people who want to participate in the discourse are able to and those who want to focus on work can tune it out.

He said companies should “allow 100% free-form debate about anything.”

But, he suggested imposing “one condition. You literally need to have a soapbox and like in

Posted in technology

Content Controversy

SEO is without doubt one of the simplest issues you are able to do on-line, getting your website optimized in such a approach that the search engines will reward you by principally sending traffic your way. They are very informative and most webmasters are concerned in SEO and utilizing it. White hat and black hat SEO are two opposing views of the best way to do seo. We all know for a fact that almost all instances you will solely click on the first few websites.

The better an individual can evaluate how search engine algorithms determine their search engine rating results and might make the most of search engine optimization to optimize websites based on his or her analysis findings, the higher the chance of the individual being able to enhance an internet site’s rankings by means of the use of seo.

The best keywords for SEO will not be necessarily the primary ones that come to your thoughts. __________Use anchor-textual content backlinks to focus on vital keywords. White hat SEO is strategies that search engines suggest pretty much as good observe and black hat SEO is these strategies that engines like google don’t approve of. For SEO consultants who practise white hat SEO, they have a tendency to provide results that final a very long time.

Quality of Website: Spammy and low high quality websites are penalized by Google and downgraded within the search outcomes. Still different bloggers argue that merely using relevant keywords as they arrive naturally within the stream of the blog posts is adequate to ensure search engines like google and yahoo understand the content material of the weblog.

So one among my rivals would possibly use the word ‘Online’ in 70% of their complete hyperlinks and ‘Poker’ in eighty five% of their links. Each …